Most executive coaching focuses on helping you feel better or be more confident. Brain-centric Design focuses on preparing the minds listening to you so they naturally adopt your ideas. We don't coach your psychology—we engineer your communication. The difference: after other coaching, you're a better performer. After Brain-centric, your audience is a better receiver.

You could compress it into 1-2 weeks if your timeline demands it. But here's what we've learned: cognitive framework integration happens in layers. Week 1 you understand the concepts. Week 2-3 you start seeing how they apply to your specific situation. Week 4+ you build genuine confidence because you've practiced multiple iterations. The timeline exists because it produces results, not because we're padding hours.

Most high-end coaches and consultants excel at one of two things: (1) helping you understand yourself better, or (2) helping you communicate more confidently. Brain-centric Design does something different: we engineer the cognitive conditions in your audience that make adoption inevitable. We apply neuroscience, not psychology or communication techniques. Fortune 100 companies didn't adopt this because we're great coaches—they adopted it because it works when everything else doesn't.

Good. You should be. Fortune 100 companies were skeptical too. That's why Brain-centric Design is co-developed with cognitive neuroscientist Dr. Kieran O'Mahony, who has trained 1M+ educators worldwide. This isn't "neuroscience-inspired" advice or "brain-friendly" tips—it's frameworks built on how the brain literally processes information. If you're skeptical, schedule the discovery call and ask the hard questions. We can show you the research and the Fortune 100 results that validate it.

Brain-centric Design explicitly rejects manipulation. The entire point is the brain buys its own ideas—meaning when you prepare minds properly, people adopt your ideas because they're good ideas they see clearly, not because you tricked them. You're not hiding anything or using tricks. You're just arranging information in the order the brain naturally processes it. It feels collaborative, not manipulative, because it is collaborative.

That depends on what's at stake. If losing this moment costs you less than $3,500, then no. If winning this moment is worth more than $10,000+ to you (faster closing negotiation, getting the promotion, landing the investor, winning the case), then it's obviously worth it. And here's what most clients discover: once you learn the framework, you use it forever. The frameworks apply to every high-stakes moment in your career. So the real ROI compounds over decades, not just your current challenge.

Here's what we guarantee: if you follow the framework we build with you, your audience will be neurologically prepared to receive your message in a way they weren't before. Whether they ultimately adopt it depends on whether your idea is actually good and whether you execute the framework properly. We're not guaranteeing they'll say yes—we're guaranteeing you'll have a much better shot at yes because their brain is prepared instead of defensive. Fortune 100 companies report $4:$1 ROI because the framework works. Your specific results depend on your execution and situation. Schedule a discovery call and we'll be honest about whether this is right for you.

Absolutely. Many professionals do Quick-Strike first to test the framework on an urgent moment, then return for Intensive when they want deeper application. Each layer builds on the previous one. And if Quick-Strike delivers results (which it typically does), you'll want to go deeper anyway.

Then you're probably not ready. The professionals who see the biggest results are the ones who treat this like their high-stakes moment matters—because it does. If your moment isn't urgent enough to invest 5-6 hours (Quick-Strike) or 10-12 hours (Intensive), then it probably isn't high-stakes enough to worry about. The question isn't "do you have time?" The question is "what's the cost of not preparing for this moment?" That usually clarifies priorities.